Creative Advocacy | Practical Advice®

News and Events

Update: U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Potential Obstacle to Certification of Securities Fraud Class Actions Against Public Companies

Monday, June 06, 2011

By Janissa Strabuk

In a unanimous opinion, the United States Supreme Court today held that securities fraud plaintiffs need not prove loss causation for a misrepresentation case to be certified as a class action. While plaintiffs must "demonstrate that the defendant's deceptive conduct caused their claimed economic loss," to prevail on the merits of their case, they need not prove loss causation at the class certification stage, wrote Chief Justice John Roberts for the court in Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., et al. The Court's ruling resolves a split in the federal Circuit courts and removes what had been a potential obstacle to class certification of certain securities fraud lawsuits against public companies.

The plaintiff, Erica P. John Fund, Inc., sued Halliburton on behalf of a proposed class of investors, alleging that Halliburton violated section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 by making deliberate false statements about certain potential liabilities in asbestos litigation, expected revenues from construction contracts, and the benefits of a merger with Dresser Industries. The Fund further alleged that after Halliburton issued disclosures correcting the purported false statements, Halliburton's stock price fell causing the investors' losses.

The key question on appeal was whether the Fund met Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3)'s requirements for class certification by demonstrating, among other requirements, that common questions of law and fact predominate over individual issues. Justice Roberts noted that "[w]hether common questions of law and fact predominate in a securities fraud action often turns on the element of reliance." Both the District Court and the Fifth Circuit concluded that the Fund had to prove loss causation to establish that the issue of reliance could be resolved on a class-wide basis. Because the Fund could not prove loss causation, certification was denied. In rejecting that ruling, Roberts wrote that such a requirement was contrary to the high court's prior rulings and that securities fraud plaintiffs need not establish loss causation to obtain class certification.

The case now goes back to the trial court, which, Justice Roberts, noted, said it would certify the class were it not for the "loss causation requirement."

More on Our Attorneys

Other Recent News

Jacob D. C. Humphreys Joins Tousley Brain Stephens

Tousley Brain Stephens is pleased to announce that attorney Jacob D. C. Humphreys has joined our team of superb lawyers and business advisors. Jake has experience in a variety of commercial litigation matters. He has represented clients in federal and state courts in matters ranging from breach of contract, trust and estate litigation, and intellectual property disputes to antitrust cases and business torts.

Read More»

Tousley Brain Stephens Closes $20.7 Million Deal for Chainqui Development

TBS attorneys Mark Deife and Chris Brain and TBS paralegal Amy Smith-Phifer successfully closed a $20.7 million deal for Chainqui Development on January 15, 2015. Chainqui purchased the Sheridan Apartment building, located at 2011 Fifth Avenue in Seattle.

Read More»

Tousley Brain Stephens PLLC Investigating Exploding Glass Sunroofs

Tousley Brain Stephens is investigating claims that glass sunroofs from various manufacturers spontaneously explode, which can shower the occupants with broken glass. Failures can occur at highway speeds or even while parked. Reports of problem appear widespread across manufacturers and models.

Read More»

Local Lighthouse Robocall Investigation

Tousley Brain Stephens is investigating unsolicited prerecorded telemarketing calls, also known as autodials or robocalls, made by Local Lighthouse. The calls claim to be "Kate" or "Sharon" from Google Plus, although we do not believe that Local Lighthouse is affiliated with Google. These calls may violate the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Under the TCPA, it is illegal for a person to use an automated telephone system or a prerecorded voice to call another person's telephone without prior consent. Recipients of these unlawful telephone calls can receive $500 for each call and up to $1500 for each call if the caller willfully or knowingly violated the TCPA.

Read More»

TBS Attorneys Obtain Settlement from Monsanto

On November 12, 2014, TBS attorneys Kim Stephens and Jason Dennett secured a $2.375 million settlement from Monsanto Corporation for soft white wheat farmers in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. The settlement resolves a number of lawsuits related to the May 2013 discovery of genetically modified wheat on a farm in Eastern Oregon and subsequent temporary limits on certain exports of soft white wheat.

Read More»