Creative Advocacy | Practical Advice®

News and Events

Update: U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Potential Obstacle to Certification of Securities Fraud Class Actions Against Public Companies

Monday, June 06, 2011

By Janissa Strabuk

In a unanimous opinion, the United States Supreme Court today held that securities fraud plaintiffs need not prove loss causation for a misrepresentation case to be certified as a class action. While plaintiffs must "demonstrate that the defendant's deceptive conduct caused their claimed economic loss," to prevail on the merits of their case, they need not prove loss causation at the class certification stage, wrote Chief Justice John Roberts for the court in Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., et al. The Court's ruling resolves a split in the federal Circuit courts and removes what had been a potential obstacle to class certification of certain securities fraud lawsuits against public companies.

The plaintiff, Erica P. John Fund, Inc., sued Halliburton on behalf of a proposed class of investors, alleging that Halliburton violated section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 by making deliberate false statements about certain potential liabilities in asbestos litigation, expected revenues from construction contracts, and the benefits of a merger with Dresser Industries. The Fund further alleged that after Halliburton issued disclosures correcting the purported false statements, Halliburton's stock price fell causing the investors' losses.

The key question on appeal was whether the Fund met Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3)'s requirements for class certification by demonstrating, among other requirements, that common questions of law and fact predominate over individual issues. Justice Roberts noted that "[w]hether common questions of law and fact predominate in a securities fraud action often turns on the element of reliance." Both the District Court and the Fifth Circuit concluded that the Fund had to prove loss causation to establish that the issue of reliance could be resolved on a class-wide basis. Because the Fund could not prove loss causation, certification was denied. In rejecting that ruling, Roberts wrote that such a requirement was contrary to the high court's prior rulings and that securities fraud plaintiffs need not establish loss causation to obtain class certification.

The case now goes back to the trial court, which, Justice Roberts, noted, said it would certify the class were it not for the "loss causation requirement."

More on Our Attorneys

Other Recent News

Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Class Action Will Settle for $84 Million

Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. has agreed to pay $84 million to settle a long-running class action lawsuit over changes the company made to annuities it sold before 1985. About 4,000 current and 29,000 former annuity owners will be eligible to share in the settlement of this case. The proposed settlement must still obtain final approval from U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman.

Read More»

Tousley Brain Stephens' Client Resolves Claims in $325 Million Neurontin Class Action Settlement

Pfizer Inc. has agreed to pay $325 million to resolve claims it defrauded insurers and other healthcare benefit providers by marketing Neurontin for unapproved uses. In the decade old class action lawsuit, TBS client, ASEA/AFSCME Local 52 Health Benefits Trust (ASEA), alleged that Pfizer and Warner-Lambert Co. sold Neurontin in an effort to boost profits for uses for which Neurontin was neither approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration nor medically effective.

Read More»

Tousley Brain Stephens Investigating Major Data Breach at Premera Blue Cross

Tousley Brain Stephens is currently investigating a major data breach at Premera Blue Cross and related companies in the states of Washington, Oregon, and Alaska. Stolen data may have included customers' social security numbers, birth dates, home addresses, email addresses, bank account information, and even medical information. The data breach occurred in May 2014, but Premera did not make a public announcement or alert its customers to the breach until March 17, 2015.

Read More»

TBS Sues Lumber Liquidators Over High Levels of Formaldehyde in Its Laminate Flooring

Tousley Brain Stephens filed suit today against Lumber Liquidators, the nation's largest flooring supplier, over allegations that some of its laminate flooring emits dangerous amounts of formaldehyde, a known cancer-causing substance.

Read More»

Tousley Brain Stephens Investigating Lumber Liquidators' Chinese Laminate Flooring

As reported in late February 2015 by 60 Minutes, certified labs have revealed that Lumber Liquidators' Chinese-made laminate flooring allegedly has the highest formaldehyde levels they have ever measured. Formaldehyde is a known human carcinogen. On average, the labs report formaldehyde emissions six to seven times levels allowed under California standards. In addition, the television news program noted that employees at the company's mills in China openly admit to falsely labeling Lumber Liquidators' laminate flooring products.

Read More»